Hindman and Hinds

November 2, 1868

Summary

The Dispatch is angry at the northern reaction to the death of Hinds. The Dispatch labels with a carpet-bag congressman who was very running a violent campaign and almost got what deserved by being killed by a drunk at a political rally. The other outrage comes from the Dispatch claiming that nobody is reporting on the murder of Hindman who they paint as a quiet, innocent ad respected man who was unjustly murdered in his home (while they mention he was a general they do not mention it was for the Confederate.

Transcription

Hindman and Hinds. - The Radical press at the North is filling the land with lamentations over the killing of Hon. James Hinds, member of Congress from Arkansas, while there is not a word bestowed on the far more brutal killing of General Hindman in the same part of the world where fell the " carpet-bagger " congressman. Hinds was to the people of Arkansas (i.e., tho white people,) a most objectionable man, and was conspicuous in the violent campaign raging there. He was shot by a drunken man laboring under high political excitement. Hindman was shot at night, while sitting in the bosom of his family, by an unknown person. He was a man of national fame, highly popular among his fellowcitizens, and had pursued a most quiet life since the war. Yet for the murder of Hinds the country must be thrown into convulsions, while Hindman's assassination is but a trifling event.
About this article

Contributed By

Jacob Markman

Identifier

MarkmanJacob-18681102-HindmanAndHinds.pdf

Citation

“Hindman and Hinds,” Reconstructing Virginia, accessed July 21, 2018, http://reconstructingvirginia.richmond.edu/items/show/1175.